Live project Live project

Data project comparing different NHS therapy approaches

This project will assess how well different NHS talking therapies and Silvercloud CBT provision work. Also, to see if they offer value for money and how well they work for different groups of people.
Statistical analysis, project page image

Project overview

What are the two projects?

This is a two-in-one package: we’ve combined two projects due to their focus being extremely similar. These two NIHR funded projects are led by the University of Sheffield, in collaboration with us here at the McPin Foundation among other collaborators across England. Both projects will assess how effective different mental health therapies are in England’s healthcare system, specifically as provided within NHS Talking Therapies for anxiety and depression services. Both projects will run for 3 years, from 1st November 2024 until 31st October 2027.

As an example of how people come into contact with NHS Talking Therapies: if someone is experiencing symptoms of anxiety or depression, their GP will likely refer them to these services, or the person can refer themselves.

The studies will compare different talking and digital therapies to look at their comparative effectiveness, if they offer value for money, and how well they work for different groups of people. We will also study if treatment outcomes are impacted by differences between people. For example, based on ethnicity or social deprivation. This could increase our understanding of what NHS therapies work best and for whom.

The studies will use real world data for this purpose, i.e. from England’s NHS Talking Therapies services, hospitals, secondary mental health services, and pharmacies. We will also involve NHS staff and patients to understand benefits and challenges to giving these different therapies.

The main difference between the two projects are the types of digital or talking therapies being compared, as described below.

 

Project One: The Target Therapies project

The first of these two project will involve comparing:

– Low intensity digitally-enabled interventions (with support) v.s therapist-guided self-help for depression

– Group versus individual-based low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for depression and anxiety

– Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) versus counselling for depression

Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing (EMDR) versus trauma-focused cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

Project Two: The SilverCloud Target Trials

The second project will specifically look at the SilverCloud online CBT (Cognitive Behavioural Therapy) platform. It’s a digital program of CBT which individuals can access at home via an app or browser. We will compare SilverCloud to individual or group low-intensity CBT for people with depression or anxiety.

Get involved 

We are looking for 14 people, from a range of backgrounds, with lived experience of accessing NHS Talking Therapies (previously known as Improving Access to Psychological Therapies [IAPT] services) to form a Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP) for this project. Find out more about how you can get involved in this research.

Find out more

Project details

Talking and digital therapies can help people manage their problems by changing the way they think and behave. NHS Talking Therapies services offer talking or digital therapies to people with depression or anxiety. But we don’t know how well different ways of providing talking or digital therapies works for different people.

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are often used for comparing different treatments. Randomised refers to allocating treatment to each person at random. This helps provide the best evidence of how well different treatments work. But many people who have therapy in ‘real-world’ NHS settings do not take part in RCTs. This limits what RCTs can tell us about normal NHS care.

Although RCTs are the gold standard for estimating causal treatment effects, they have limitations for informing treatment allocation and clinical guidelines; also, due to finite resources, more cost-efficient vehicles are needed to inform evidence-based decision-making. Rather than doing an RCT, this study is using real world data, which has its strengths. Unlike RCT’s, real world data looks at treatment as usual i.e data that is already collected as part of routine NHS care. Furthermore, we will be studying if treatment outcomes are impacted by differences between people – such as different ethnicities or experiences social deprivation. We will also involve NHS staff and patients to understand challenges to giving iCBT. The project could help inform evidence-based decision-making with a clear direction to patient benefit.

One other importance is the lived experience involvement: we will be involving people in aspects of the research which have seldom been done before. It is vital to explore how lived experience involvement can be made as meaningful and as accessible as possible in different types of research.

Forming a group of 14 people with lived experience of anxiety, depression, and different forms of talking or digital therapies provided within NHS Talking Therapies; for example, individual, group, or internet delivered CBT for depression or anxiety, or EMDR or trauma-focussed CBT for PTSD. The group will be involved in the following ways:

  • help develop the study design and research questions;
  • receive training, development opportunities and support throughout their time on the project;
  • Interpret and make sense of study results, drawing on lived experience to contextualise the findings;
  • develop ways to explain our study design and results to different audiences to ensure everyone can access them;
  • Opportunity to co-author on a paper to describe our lived experience-centred approach to this work.

One key area that the LEAP will be trained to co-develop is the directed acyclic graphs (DAG). DAGs visually represent how different variables impact one another. For instance, how different demographics might impact someone’s treatment outcomes. Find out more here.

Check out this info video here – https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4r6snqj0gnY

 

We will link to the University of Sheffield’s webpage once it is live. For now please email [email protected] if you would like anymore info.

 

Project resources

Talking Point
Talking Point

Patient and Public Involvement in Research, Why Not?

We hope these papers and the discussion around them will aid us in our mission to transform mental health research. Talking Point papers are funded by McPin, but the views expressed are the authors'.
Research methods | 19th January 2023

Related projects

Work with us

We are always excited to hear from others who want to collaborate on mental health research. From delivering peer research to helping you with public involvement strategies and providing training, get in touch to chat.